Foreclosure Help
FORECLOSURES ARE RISING DRAMATICALLY ACROSS THE UNITED STATES. HELP IS AVAILABLE THROUGH THIS BLOG AND THE LINKS YOU WILL FIND THROUGHOUT THIS WEBSITE.

Main

Home
My Profile
Weblog Archives
Friends

Categories


Links

Save Your Home
Help Others Facing Foreclosure
Become A Consultant


Google

Bankruptcy Mortgage Relief by Marcie Geffner

Federal bankruptcy courts currently offer only scant relief to homeowners who can't afford to pay their mortgages. That could change, if supporters of legislation that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages can muster enough votes in Congress to override a threatened presidential veto. Giving bankruptcy courts the authority to modify home loans would be a palatable way to accommodate both borrowers and lenders, says Jack Williams, a bankruptcy professor at Georgia State University College of Law. Borrowers would "get to keep a major asset with significant upside potential" and avoid the emotional wound of losing their homes, while lenders would be placed in "a position based on the fair market value of the property," which would be better than a foreclosure, Williams says.

Currently, bankruptcy affords "very limited protection to a (homeowner) who has a financial problem with a home mortgage company," Williams says. Filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which is characterized by a debt repayment plan, can spread out prior delinquent payments over a number of months or years in the future; however, no bankruptcy proceeding can modify the terms of an existing home loan on a principal residence.

That prohibition is an "anomaly," Williams says, because bankruptcy courts can modify the terms of virtually all other types of debts, including home loans secured by second/vacation homes or investment properties. Only the principal residence is excluded from bankruptcy judges' authority.

Subprime mortgage crisis triggers new look at bankruptcy

The exception for residential mortgages dates back to 1978, when the bankruptcy code was written, says Williams, who is also a scholar-in-residence at the American Bankruptcy Institute, or ABI, a nonpartisan organization that researches issues related to insolvency. That exception makes home loan lenders a favored class of creditors and originally was intended to encourage mortgage lending.

Thirty years later, after rapid and radical innovation in home loans and mortgage lending, that purpose may no longer make sense as good public policy, says Susanne M. Robicsek, a bankruptcy attorney in Charlotte, N.C.

"Historically, the argument was that they didn't want to discourage banks from making loans to consumers. The types of loans have changed immensely, and we now find ourselves in a new lending environment that has led to a crisis that can't be solved," she says.

That crisis has consisted of a spike in delinquent payments and defaults on home loans and a rise in bank foreclosures on residential properties, especially in such states as California and Florida. The crisis has led to finger-pointing at several causes and culprits.

Mortgage crisis culprits:
  • Greedy, foolish and unsophisticated borrowers.
  • Inflated home valuations and appraisals.
  • Aggressive and unethical mortgage brokers.
  • Misguided and fraudulent lending practices.
  • Faulty home loan products.
  • Lax, inadequate or absent regulatory oversight.

Judicial power would be limited

The bankruptcy bills that have been introduced in Congress would place limits on who would be eligible for home loan modifications, according to a briefing paper published by the Center for Responsible Lending, a nonprofit research organization in Durham, N.C. As written, the legislation would contain several restrictions.

Restrictions in legislation

Relief would be limited to homeowners who:
  • Didn't earn enough income to afford their mortgage payments.
  • Had a subprime or nontraditional loan such as an interest-only or payment-option adjustable-rate mortgage.
  • Faced imminent foreclosure.

Bankruptcy judges would be required to:
  • Set commercially reasonable interest rates on modified mortgages.
  • Not reduce loan balances to less than the market value of the property.

The time frame for relief would be restricted to:
  • Loans that were originated on or after Jan. 1, 2000.
  • A seven-year period, after which the law would sunset, unless it was extended.

Would mortgage modifications encourage more bankruptcy filings?

Critics have suggested that more flexible bankruptcy laws would encourage disgruntled homeowners to file bankruptcy solely to escape mortgage payments that were affordable, but that they believed to be onerous. And indeed, consumer bankruptcy filings already are on the rise. A total of 76,120 bankruptcies were filed in February 2008, a 15% increase compared with the 66,050 consumer filings counted in January, according to the ABI.

The argument that mortgage modification would spur even more bankruptcies was raised and refuted by Rich Leonard, a bankruptcy judge in North Carolina. Leonard noted, in testimony before a congressional committee, that the precedents of existing bankruptcy cases already "sharply curtailed" judges' discretion with respect to modifications of other types of debt.

"The idea that we would (or could) somehow willy-nilly give everyone a 40-year mortgage at 2% interest is ludicrous," he told the committee.

Would 'cram-downs' cause more foreclosures?

The Mortgage Bankers Association, or MBA, also has insisted that allowing bankruptcy judges to modify -- or, to use the group's verbiage, "cram down" -- the interest rate or principal on owner-occupant residential mortgages would unleash a number of woes. A handout posted on the association's Web site states that the House of Representatives' version of the bill, would do four things.


MBA says proposed bill would:
  • Increase the cost of all mortgages.
  • Increase foreclosures.
  • Hinder refinancing of existing loans.
  • Harm federal loan programs.

The MBA also has claimed that mortgage modifications would create more uncertainty about home values, which would result in more risk for lenders and, thus, higher closing costs and interest rates for homebuyers.

Similar concerns were voiced by Alphonso Jackson, secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

"Rewriting bankruptcy laws seems an odd, time-consuming, distant way to help homeowners," Jackson said during a recent foreclosure prevention conference in Los Angeles. "It will only increase interest rates. And the litigation with such a move will negate any benefit, except maybe to lawyers and their firms."

Williams scoffs at such concerns.

"The argument that interest rates would go up doesn't make any sense, and (the MBA has) never offered any proof to support it," he says.

A recent academic working paper, "The Effect of Bankruptcy Strip-Down on Mortgage Markets," also refuted the MBA's position. The authors, Adam J. Levitin and Joshua Goodman of Georgetown University Law Center, analyzed current and historical mortgage data to measure the effects of bankruptcy "strip-down" (another word for cram-down) or modification of residential mortgages. They conclude that permitting unlimited strip-downs would have insignificant or no impact on mortgage interest rates or mortgage markets.

Outlook for action this year is uncertain

The House Judiciary Committee passed a version of the bankruptcy bill in December. The companion bill has been stalled for procedural reasons in the Senate, but U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the bill's chief supporter, has vowed not to drop the effort.

Such determination may not be enough to carry the day since President Bush has declared his opposition to allowing bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of owner-occupant home loans. The administration issued a policy statement that says changing the bankruptcy code in this way would "undermine existing contracts, leading to contraction in mortgage credit availability and affordability" and "likely prolong the time it will take the market to recover from the current downturn."

If Congress and the president can't come to an agreement, the national elections in November may determine whether bankruptcy courts will be empowered to grant mortgage relief for homeowners.

Posted: 7:08 PM, Mar. 24, 2008
Comments (0) | Add Comment | Link

Rep. Frank offers new foreclosure help plan By Ruth Mantell

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., on Thursday announced a plan to "stem the significant rise in mortgage foreclosures" by enabling the Federal Housing Administration to insure and guarantee refinanced mortgages that have been significantly written-down by mortgage holders and lenders. Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, will seek input over the next few weeks. The current plan would permit FHA to provide up to $300 billion in new guarantees to help to refinance at-risk borrowers. In exchange for accepting a "substantial" write-down of principal, lenders or mortgage holders would receive payment from the proceeds of a new FHA loan if the restructured loan resulted in terms that the borrower "can reasonably be expected to pay." 

Posted: 12:43 PM, Mar. 20, 2008
Comments (0) | Add Comment | Link

Mediation Instead of Foreclosure

Lenders are beginning to acknowledge that foreclosure is not as good an option
for them as modifying loans and keeping people in their homes. That may mean
that for 2008 we’ll have fewer foreclosures than in 2007. That is good news
because there are so many adjustable rate mortgages that are resetting to higher
interest rates this year.

There is more awareness about the foreclosure problem because there’s so much
in the media nationally and locally. People who are in danger of losing their homes
are paying attention about community resources and some of the ways they may be
able to save their homes.

Another factor is legislative initiatives to conduct mediation in foreclosure action. That
would mean that before a lender can get foreclosure, they have to sit down with the
borrower and see if they can keep the person in their home. They won't be able to 
foreclose without meaningful mediation first. This is a new direction that hadn’t been
done before in foreclosure cases.

Many people are getting assistance, but there are thousands of other families who feel
very isolated and hopeless while being among thousands of people facing foreclosure.

Posted: 4:32 PM, Mar. 19, 2008
Comments (0) | Add Comment | Link

Homeowners should get help if house is threatened

Rule one: Don't ignore bank if you get behind

Perhaps the first thing new homebuyers should know when they sign a mortgage is that their annual expenses, including taxes and insurance, should not exceed 36% of their household income, according to several lending institutions.

Lester Wilkins, a loan officer at Flagstar Bank in Fort Gratiot, said in the current housing market people should consider a total housing expense closer to 25%, and people should have cash reserves of about two or three month's wages for security.

If borrowers find themselves suddenly struggling to make their mortgage payments, he said, they should contact their lender's loss mitigation department.

"Banks do not want to default on a mortgage as much if not more than the borrowers. It is estimated a bank starts off with a 40% loss in the individual investment as soon as they reclaim the property," he said. "Banks are often willing to modify a borrower's loan ... this is becoming almost commonplace in light of the foreclosure epidemic."

Over the next two years, the Department of Housing and Urban Development estimates 2.3 million adjustable-rate mortgages will reset, and nearly a quarter of these homeowners will be at risk of foreclosure as interest rates rise.

Last year, the department implemented the FHASecure plan that allows borrowers with a history of timely mortgage payments to refinance their sub-prime loans.

The department also offers these tips for avoiding foreclosure, beginning with responding to lender's letters:

  • Do not ignore communications from your lender: Be prepared to provide them with financial information, such as your monthly income and expenses.
  • Stay in your home for now: You may not qualify for assistance if you abandon your property.
  • Beware of scams: Do not sign anything you don't understand, and remember that signing over the deed to someone else (who promises to repair bad credit or manage mounting debts) does not necessarily relieve you of your loan obligation.
  • Contact a HUD-approved housing counseling agency at (800) 569-4287: These agencies frequently have information on services and programs offered by government agencies as well as private and community organizations that can help.

    John Niebieszczanski, a field operations chief with HUD and an Algonac resident, said the best defense against loan defaults is a good offense.

    "It's important that people are proactive," he said. "The thing is getting people to make that step and not the day before the house goes into foreclosure."


  • Posted: 8:57 PM, Jan. 17, 2008
    Comments (0) | Add Comment | Link

    Mortgage Help Not Easy To Get by Nathan Hurst / The Detroit News

    Some homeowners who are still paying their adjustable-rate mortgages on time -- but are struggling to do so and are worried about keeping up when the payments adjust even higher -- are finding that their mortgage company won't help them until they actually fall behind.

    In short, the time-honored advice to take action before you get in trouble, and contact your lender to work out a solution, doesn't appear to hold true in these days of soaring foreclosures and tighter credit. Lenders aren't required to bail out homeowners when their mortgage rates and payments adjust upward, even though they've been under enormous pressure from lawmakers and consumer groups to do so.

    In December, President Bush called on lenders to relax their rules and negotiate lower interest rates to help homeowners avoid foreclosures. Critics said Bush's plan was both limited in scope and voluntary, and said many homeowners stuck in a bad situation wouldn't get the help they needed. It appears the critics were right.

    "We're seeing a lot of homeowners who are doing exactly what the banks are asking them to do and being told there's no help for them," said Pava Leyrer, a mortgage broker in Grandville and former president of the Michigan Mortgage Brokers Association. "They're being told that because they haven't missed a payment yet, the bank can't do anything."

    The predicament has consumers in a Catch-22: They're being told that even with spotless credit, they can't get help. Instead, they must miss payments, and even then assistance from the lender isn't a certainty.

    Lenders maintain they're doing what they can for struggling homeowners -- such as delaying an interest rate adjustment or lowering the interest rate cap on a homeowner's ARM. They also look at each person's situation to determine if they can refinance an ARM to a fixed-rate loan.

    But they admit that today's tight credit market is making it more difficult to help.

    "The rules for writing mortgages have changed," said Robert Rahal, president of Shore Mortgage in Birmingham, which sells only federally backed home loans. "In many cases, lenders are having to cut back on who they offer new loans for, and the refinance sector is feeling the pinch as well."

    Two jobs just to keep up

    Dan Przewlocki of Memphis is one homeowner caught in that pinch.

    Przewlocki purchased his four-bedroom, three-bath colonial on 15 rural acres in Saint Clair County for $310,000 three years ago with an adjustable-rate mortgage through Washington Mutual, the Seattle-based bank and mortgage lender.

    Przewlocki, a plant maintenance worker and National Guard reservist, purchased the home using a product called an Option ARM. That type of loan, geared toward those with fluctuating paychecks, establishes a low monthly payment -- that usually covers only interest -- and gives a consumer the option to pay more during months when income is higher.

    "I figured it would be a good plan for me," Przewlocki said. "I wanted to pay more while I was working my regular job and less when I'm on active duty, since my pay is less."

    For the first year, his ultra-low teaser rate of 2 percent meant payments were affordable, and Przewlocki said he was easily able to pay down the principal on his loan. He was expecting his first adjustment -- which boosted his interest rate to 6.5 percent -- but said a more recent increase to 7.625 percent has made his home nearly unaffordable.

    "Things are extremely tight," Przewlocki said. "I'm working a second temp job just to pay the interest down."

    Przewlocki said he knew in October that keeping up with the mortgage would be a problem. So he contacted Washington Mutual in hopes of either refinancing to a fixed-rate loan or modifying the terms of his current ARM.

    And when he received a letter from the lender in November touting mortgage refinancing as a way to deal with higher adjusting payments on his loan, Przewlocki figured the company would be willing to help.

    Just seven days later, Przewlocki received a letter saying he couldn't refinance his loan. When he called to ask why, he was told that because he hadn't yet missed a payment, there wasn't anything the company could do.

    "Essentially, I'll have to ruin my credit before they'll modify my loan," Przewlocki said. "I was told blatantly on the phone, 'Skip a payment and maybe we can do something.' But I've got perfect credit. I shouldn't have to do that."

    Multiple Washington Mutual spokesmen and women declined to comment on Przewlocki's case, citing company policy that bars them from making statements about specific consumer accounts.

    But company executives said they're doing all they can to help troubled homeowners. Initiatives have included setting up a hotline for those concerned about making their mortgage payments, halting the sale of risky subprime mortgages that are more likely to default and committing $2 billion toward helping subprime borrowers refinance into more stable loans.

    "Our firm belief is that early intervention combined with expanded options is instrumental to helping our customers find ways they can overcome financial obstacles to keep their home," said David Schneider, president of Washington Mutual's home loans division, in an early December statement to investors.

    "We view foreclosure as a last resort and encourage our customers to contact us as soon as they anticipate difficulty in making payments on their mortgage so that we can discuss their various options."

    Credit counselors step in

    Still, because of the credit crunch and tougher mortgage rules, lenders are finding it increasingly difficult to help homeowners, especially those who are upside down on their homes, which means they owe more on their loans than their home is worth. That's especially prevalent in markets such as Michigan where home prices have declined sharply.

    The new tighter lending standards, prompted by the subprime mortgage meltdown, require homeowners to either have some equity in their home or come up with a down payment before they can refinance from an ARM to a fixed-rate loan.

    Natasha Swoish, manager of bankruptcy counseling and education services at GreenPath Inc., a Farmington Hills-based credit counseling service, said consumer trouble with lenders has caused a growing number of borrowers to seek help through outside agencies like hers.

    "Homeowners are having to look at a number of different options," Swoish said. "In many cases, there are ways to work with lenders but they are working with many more people needing help these days."

    Swoish advises homeowners to call a consumer credit counseling agency or other financial adviser that may be able to mediate between a borrower and lender.

    Crisis squeezes lenders too

    Business considerations also limit lenders' ability to provide philanthropic loan modifications, said Rahal, the Shore Mortgage president.

    Modifying the terms of a loan to include a too-low interest rate could cause the bank to actually lose money on the mortgage, he said, and that wouldn't make the bank's investors very happy.

    "In many cases, these loans are producing at most a razor-thin margin for the lender," Rahal said. "For lenders that are already on the edge, every drop in an interest rate for a loan can be a step closer to death."

    In addition, many home mortgages are bundled and sold to investors, who expect a certain amount of return for the risk of carrying the loans. Banks working with such investors try to avoid lowering interest rates that could make the mortgages more difficult to sell.

    Still, lenders are trying to work with the flood of customers trying to refinance, said Mike Kruczek, chief lending officer at Dearborn Federal Credit Union. "We're seeing a lot of people approaching us worried over their home loans," Kruczek said. "In most cases, there's a solution."

    Countrywide Financial, a large national lender that has been at the center of the subprime market meltdown, said it has made significant strides in helping troubled mortgage payers. In November, it said it modified the terms of 12,565 home loans and worked out other foreclosure avoidance measures with another 2,000 homeowners.

    Upside down, at a dead end

    Getting help can become even more convoluted when a homeowner's lender goes under or is sold, as is the case for Donnell and Heather Freeman of Southfield.

    The Freemans are barely making their $2,600-a-month mortgage payment. They purchased their four-bedroom, three-bath colonial with a two-car garage two years ago for $190,000 with a mortgage from American Home Mortgage, which has since entered bankruptcy.

    Heather Freeman, who works as a customer service representative for DTE Energy, said she and her husband have been scrounging for overtime at work to make their house payment, which has more than doubled in less than two years under the terms of their ARM.

    They tried contacting American Home Mortgage in December to modify the terms of their loan, but because the company is transitioning to new ownership, the Freemans were told they would have to look for help elsewhere.

    Because the value of their home is only about $165,000, according to a recent assessment, they would need to pay thousands of dollars up front, money they don't have, for a more favorable mortgage.

    "There's help being offered everywhere, it seems, but not for me in my situation," Heather Freeman said. "I have top tier credit, and I want to stay in my house. I shouldn't have to throw one away for the other."

     

    Posted: 5:59 PM, Jan. 13, 2008
    Comments (0) | Add Comment | Link